On this blog posting I will be publishing the reply that the JCLA sent Chris Bright of the JEP.
First up I wish Stuart Syvret all the best for tomorrow. No matter what happens the fight goes on. Tomorrows judgement is the beginning of the real stuff. Judge Pritchers knows that it's not as simple as just putting Syvret in Jail - unlike a local Magistrate who was under the spell of Stephen Baker.
We are also heading into the next election - no doubt this will be keeping us all on our toes as Team Ozouf/ Walker go into some Viagra Endused Election Feeding Frenzy - interesting times. We will also be looking at the Establishment Big Gun the Feudal King himself Sir Philip of Bailhache - Sharp Report - Holland Affair- Reg's Skips - Independence - Liberation Day Speech 2008 - Illegally kicking Syvret out the States for 6 months etc etc etc plus all the other right wingers they will be trying to force through so Senator Ozouf can become Chief Minister.
I was asked the other day that if I had to choose between Senator Le Marquand or Senator Ozouf to become Chief Minister who would I choose, the answer is very simple, it was Senator Le Marquand. This might shock some people but I have my reasons and all will explained over the coming months but let us not be under any doubt as to where Senator Ozouf and his Right Wing Puppet Masters are leading us.
The next round of BDO Scrutiny hearings are looming on the Horizon there are many unanswered questions relating to this. The one im trying to get my head around is that the likes of Perchard, Shenton, Power and their Gimp Like Troll are looking to all corners of the world to try and stick a leak on Lenny Harper yet under their very noses they have Mick Gradwell who WAS leaking to known Abuse Denier Journalist David Rose but there not interested WHY???????????
Guys, what's the problem here?
You have the Abuse Survivors best interests at heart here surely???
You don't need wild Goose Chasers concerning the 'NOTW' why haven't you lodged any questions concerning the conduct of D/Supt Mick Gradwell - Come on boys I don't get it. Why are you all Anti Harper/ Abuse Investigation? What happened before the 23rd February 2008 that got you all fired up. The fact that you have used a Child Abuse Investigation to try and trash and undermine the lead SIO Lenny Harper says more about you than him. The one thing that would make your conduct easier to fathom is publishing all the good things that you have done concerning the Child Abuse Investigation you know an impartial stance - but nothing you Attack Attack Attack.
On this video from Scrutiny im talking about Senator Le Marquand & D/Supt Mick Gradwell -
The below letter is from the JCLA to the JEP
You can read the original letter that they refused to publish here
3'd August 2011
Dear Mr Bright,
Thank you for your letter dated 28ft July outlining your reasons for not wishing to publish our letter in its fullest form. However, we have no intention of redrafting this letter as suggested, and indeed if we can make the following points perhaps you will see why. Firstly, nowhere did we say your headline mentioned leaks, indeed we quoted your headline exactly as it was. However the article that followed was clearly about leaks, and indeed more than half the article is focussed on Lenny Harper therefore leaving readers in no doubt as to what you were inferring, and which I believe Mr Harper shares similar sentiments about. Misleading journalism at its worst/best? Only the public canjudge.
Secondly, you do not state which 'assumptions' you feel are unsubstantiated or potentially defamatory, so let us try and work it out for ourselves. The behaviour of Messrs Shenton and Power has been widely published in the public domain, so we can assume you are not referring to them. Mr Gradwell is now known to have leaked information to the press. This has been confirmed at the BDO Scrutiny hearing, and Mr Warcup is also known to have refused Lenny Harper to be interviewed as part of the same enquiry. That is on public record. Is it therefore Mr Perchard you are speaking of? It is in the public domain both in sworn affidavits from Graham Power and LennyHarper that he indeed leaked confidential information to David Rose. I quote from a comment Mr Harper has already made, again publicly - 'However for their benefit, at no time, unlike Perchard and Gradwell did I unlawfully leak confidential information to any journalist. Let me repeat again - David Rose in a reeorded conversation admitted that Perchard leaked him a confidential police e mail. Perchard was the recipient of that e mail. that is why we suggested that Mr Perchard's behaviour should also be subject to investigation alongside that of Mr Gradwell. You also state that the behaviour of David Rose would be extraordinary behaviour for any journalist. However it would seem to us that Mr Rose IS no ordinary journalist!
It is quite easy to do searches on the internet to see he has not always behaved in a professional manner. Just again to quote one source it is said of him - David Rose is a British journalist who by his own admission served as a conduit for intelligence
disinformation on both sides of the Atlantic. Three of his stories, based on alarmist testimony from INC defectors and asserting an lraq-al-Qaida link' played a key role in selling the Iraq war.
Rose has also repeatedly written articles misquoting scientists on climate change. This journalist who could not possibly behave in an extraordinary manner is also a known child abuse denier.
However, with hindsight, it came as no great surprise that you would not publish our letter. There has nevei been a great deal of interest in the abuse survivors from the JEp, as indeed the only interest into the Historic Abuse enquiry seems to have been to
trash both that and Mr. Power and Mr Harper.
We are disappointed that once again the abuse survivors have not been afforded the opportunity io put their views forward in your papef. As you are probably aware our original letter has now appeared on a couple of blogs where we hope it will be read by