Wednesday, January 18, 2012

MATT TAPP FILES - 5





PROTECT AT ALL COSTS





















Matt Tapp - 5



Today we introduce one the most Toxic Edifices in Jersey. This Toxic Edifice goes by the name of the "JERSEY EVENING POST" (JEP). This paper is a disgrace and a danger to Children who are in the care of the States of Jersey. This paper has failed the children of Jersey. 



WHY? 



Why does the JEP act the way it does? What is this paper hiding? You don't need to be Einstein to know that something is seriously wrong up at Five Oaks concerning  this paper and the Jersey Child Abuse Investigation. The role of this paper will develop over the coming months.




We have been through the arrival of  DCO Warcup to Jersey in August 2008 and the concerns he had about Operation Rectangle ( The Jersey Child Abuse Investigation). This was  from articles he had read in the National Papers and from people who had his ear.




We  also know  that outside Media Consultant Matt Tapp shortly followed David Warcup to Jersey in  September 2008.  What concerns me greatly is that we know very little about this consultant or how his report was commissioned and constructed.




What should concern everybody is how this consultants work grew to become the Holy Grail in debunking Operation Rectangle.  I find it incredible that Judge PItchers is quoting it as some kind of solid piece of fact.  This is what Stuart Syvret said concerning this issue; 


"The big - very big - questions here, are not that the report was disclosed to the defense - but rather, why was this particular report commissioned and produced in the first place?

And how - on Earth - did the judge end up accepting it as uncontested, given fact - even to the extent of deferring his own findings and those of the court - and effectively handing "the stage" to a concoction of vacuous and uncontested assertions written by politically employed spin-doctors?

That is what Judge Pitchers did - be reading out parts of the Matt Tapp report"



 Some serious questions need to be put to Home Affairs Minister Ian le Marquand concerning Matt Tapp and his report.  Remember this report was being compiled in the lead up to the suspension of former CPO Graham Power on the 12th November 2008. 



This question must be asked and it was by someone who left me a comment - 



"Have we just been watching one big staged managed show down at the Royal Court?"  



Judge Pitchers said that the press conference that took place on the 12th November 2008 went along way to dispelling the lurid reporting. This is what he said; 


18. I now turn to the factors that lead me to reject this part of the application.

(i) First in November 2008 the new senior investigation officer held a press conference in which he put the record straight about the findings under the building.  That press conference received wide publicity and the tone of press reporting has changed, indeed the prosecution might now argue that they risk encountering jurors who believe that the Police have said that everything that had gone before was wrong.  In my judgment this press conference went a long way to repair the damage that had been done by earlier press publicity.

(ii) Second there was a clear divide between the reporting of the torture dungeon and the general part of the inquiry which was into historic child sex abuse.  That part of the inquiry did not receive the same lurid treatment.  It will be immediately apparent to any juror hearing this case opened that there is no allegation against any of these men of anything which might be linked to the supposed torture dungeon.

(iii) Thirdly none of the lurid stories connected any named individuals to what was being described, indeed Mr Donnelly and Mr Aubin do not even fall into the category of staff at the home who were, in general terms, being accused of criminal offences.  Mr Donnelly is indeed nothing to do with the inquiry into the home at all.


Now we get to see the real game. A bigger picture is starting to form. I will be explaining it in an Interview at the weekend.  I will also be contacting the former Chief of  Police  Graham Power for his side of the Matt Tapp story.  Graham Power was in charge of the States of Jersey Police when this consultant arrived. 



But what about this case. 




Remember  all the accused who were appearing in court were investigated by Lenny Harper and his team. Judge Pitchers ruled that the accused would stand trial . On the 20 August 2009 Claude Wateridge was found guilty on eight abuse charges.  


Gordan Claude Wateridge

A jury at the Royal Court of Jersey in St Helier, has found Gordon Claude Wateridge, guilty of nine of the 21 counts against which he was charged.

The jury, made up of 10 men and two women, found him guilty of eight counts of indecent assault and one count of assault. He was found not guilty of 11 counts of indecent assault and one count of incitement to indecent assault.

The trial began on Monday 10 August 2009 and the jury delivered their verdicts on Thursday 20 August 2009. The offences were alleged to have taken place at the former children’s home Haut de la Garenne in the Parish of St Martin, between 1970 and 1974, when he was a house-parent there.

During summing up the judge Commissioner Sir Christopher Pitchers, told the 78-year-old defendant that a custodial sentence was likely as he had held a “position of trust” at the former children’s home.

Sentencing is likely to take place in mid-September 2009.

Notes:
1. The judge was Commissioner Sir Christopher Pitchers.
2. The prosecuting counsel was Crown Advocate Stephen Baker.
3. The defence counsel was Advocate Michael Preston.



What happened next with the reporting of the JEP is where the Tapp story develops . You would have fought they would have hailed Harper and his team for their sterling work. Well, the team working under Lenny Harper got  some  praise but not  Mr Harper.  There was a reason that the SIO didn't get any praise.  How do you keep telling the simple folk of Jersey that Lenny Harper dug up St Martin, found a coconut, wasted loads of money etc etc and then tell them that he and his team have just convicted 3 Child Abusers? They are still using old propaganda techniques left over by the invading Germans. 



The Jersey Evening Post edition of the 21st August 2009 is a must see.



I went to the library and obtained a copy for my research. I nearly fell down the stairs when it dawned on me just what they were doing. 



Absolute Propaganda



Wateridge - convicted of indecently assaulting girls gets half a front page and a small headline. The rest of the front page is Lenny Harper and this Headline;



A case of ‘lies and half-truths’

Friday 21st August 2009, 3:00PM BST.

Gordon Wateridge leaves the Royal Court after being found guilty on a number of counts. Picture by Richard Wainwright (00770033)

Gordon Wateridge leaves the Royal Court after being found guilty on a number of counts. Picture by Richard Wainwright (00770033)

STRONG criticism of former deputy police chief Lenny Harper’s handling of the Haut de la Garenne inquiry has been voiced by a lawyer and a senior judge, who has called his media activities ‘extraordinary’.

The international publicity generated by Mr Harper’s press conferences at the former children’s home ‘whipped up a frenzy of interest in … what turned out to be unfounded suggestions of multiple murders and torture in secret cellars under a building’, said Royal Court Commissioner Sir Christopher Pitchers as he rejected a pre-trial claim that men charged in the historical child abuse inquiry could not receive a fair trial because of the worldwide publicity.

Now retired and living in Scotland, Mr Harper has denied a claim that he was told by an archaeologist that a fragment of material found there and presented as ‘potential human remains’ predated the building. It is claimed that he was told this soon after it had been found.

Mr Harper’s actions in relation to the inquiry which he led were heavily criticised in a Royal Court hearing earlier this year which only now can be reported because of legal reasons.

At that hearing, Advocates Mike Preston and David Hopwood submitted that it would be impossible for their clients, Gordon Wateridge, Michael Aubin and Claude Donnelly, who were charged as part of the historical child abuse inquiry, to have a fair trial because of the worldwide publicity generated by the case. Mr Harper has since described the claims as ‘rubbish’.

Commissioner Sir Christopher Pitchers, who presided at the hearing and ruled that it was possible for the three men to have a fair trial.

• Full reports of the Assize trial verdict and pre-trial hearing in today’s Jersey Evening Post






















































Page 2 contained this;


"Judge Looks at Senator's Blog Comments". This is reference to Stuart Syvret's Blog



Page 3;    we get a nice big picture of Gradwell with the line "officer pays tribute to the team who worked towards Wateridge" He thanks everyone except for one person and that is Lenny Harper.


 Bottom of page 3; more attacks on Harper 



Page 4;   Top Half     'Extraordinary Actions'   Slagging off Lenny Harper again


Bottom Half  Police publicity 'based on lies and half-truths' 


This is plain crazy. They give Advocate Preston who lost the case half a page where again its slagging off Lenny Harper and his investigation. Im not joking here its all there.



Page 6;    'Unfounded suggestions of murder and tortur'   This is where they bring in Matt Tapp and his Holy Grail


At the Bottom of the page we have 'its a dishonest attempt to cover over the facts' 


This is from Lenny harper rejecting court criticisms of his investigation. But below that the JEP mention Harper and  a book deal



This all appears on the 21st  August 2009 edition with the promise of a load more on the 22nd and having obtained a copy of that paper it leaves you shocked.



I started by saying that the Jersey Evening Post is a Toxic Edifice and a danger to children in the care of the States of Jersey and I stand by it.  I do my research and it horrifies me.  Can it be for the simple reason that it receives money from the States of Jersey? This must be stopped and stopped soon. It must be seen to be independent. It shouldn't have any attachment to the SoJ or funding.



Believe you me this gets worse. Remember what they did when the BDO Report came out and they went with the "Hollywood Lifestyle" of Harper garbage.



What are they Hiding or so Scared about?



Matt Tapp and his Mystical Report - all just used in the BIG COVER-UP




Rico Sorda 




Team Voice





 




41 comments:

Anonymous said...

Rico,we are now at Matt Tapp No.5 and i am still none the wiser as to what he did.

rico sorda said...

Matt Tapp gets brought in by Warcup, he then resigns, writes a report, this report gets used by a judge who quotes it as the whole truth and nothing but the truth. From what has been disclosed from the judgement his report is nonsense.

Read the review by the Home Affairs Sub Panel on the BDO Review and you will see why I'm getting very worried about this Matt Tapp Report.

Anonymous said...

Not only that Rico,

State Media along with Mr. Le Marquand are still passing off to the public this very expensive report from Wiltshire, as definitive, not accurately as one side in a disciplinary action, which led to no charges being bought against Mr. Power.

We have yet to see Mr. Powers reply to this report being published.

Why was Mr. Power suspended?

Anonymous said...

Matt Tapp resigns...........and then he writes A report !
So many people doing reports!
I thought that we had heard the last of the many reports and now we have yet another one,and this produced by someone that most of us have never heard of. What precisely did he write.Do we have his full report/reports and how does he tie in with Bdo,if at all, considering that they were employing Kellet.

Zoompad said...

There is much more to come with the Matt Tapp scandal. Be patient and let Rico unravel this in his own time.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Rico

A reader asks the question:

"Why was Mr. Power suspended?"

That, of course, is THE question.

There was the "official" "reason" - the allegation that the child abuse investigation had not been well-managed because it had caused unjustified bad publicity for Jersey.

But we now know that "reason" was wrong and wholly unjustified.

We know that, not least because even the Jersey oligarchy now acknowledge the truth; witness the recent confessional statements of Ian Le Marquand.

So the real question - the $64,000 question - is "what were the "unofficial" - the "real reasons" - for the suspension of Graham Power?

There were a number of real reasons - of separate motivations - that all converged - so much so that the suspension of Graham Power, with the attendant dishonest trashing of the child abuse investigation - seemed like the "perfect solution" in the eyes of the Jersey oligarchy.

Much of the real "thinking" of the Jersey oligarchy is already there - exposed - on the evidence - for anyone minded to think about the situation.

And the full truth will be exposed in due course.

In the mean-time, be patient. It should be enough to know that Rico is doing great work here.

It's no exaggeration to say, that when you read this blog, you are reading the work of a journalist whose standards, ethics, and the importance of his work - transcends that of every current mainstream hack in Jersey.

Stuart

voiceforchildren said...

Rico.

Two Paedophiles taken off our streets, which should be celebrated by every man woman and child and Jersey's only "news"paper uses it as an opportunity to attack the investigator Lenny Harper, who with his team, for the first time in Jersey's history investigated "State Sponsored Paedophilia."

The "news"paper quotes the living daylights out of the defence case as though they had won the bl--dy case! They lost.!!!

The sooner people wake up to the poison peddled by Jersey's State Media the sooner us parents will be able to sleep at night. As it is children in Jersey are not safe, nor will they be, until we get something that resembles an independent or challenging "Accredited" media.

Anonymous said...

I would like to see the true figures given in the pr attempt to suspend Mr. Power and save Jerseys reputation.

Napier, Wilthire, BDO, Matt Tapp, PR Local Golden handshakes? please feel free to add to the above

Anonymous said...

Could I add the court costs in the attempts to silence Mr. Syvret to the list I previously posted.

Anonymous said...

Portion of salary paid to politians that vote in the right direction to enable this PR campaign. Who do not read the evidence they as politians voted on obtaining.

A true cost to the Jersey taxpayer in the attempt to suspend Mr. Power.

Anonymous said...

Accountants wages that had overall responsibility for States of Jersey Police.

Portion of Mr. Le Sueurs wages, Mr. Walkers and Mr. Le Marquands.

CTV award winning presentation this must come at a cost to the taxpayer as they were working with material paid for by the taxpayer.

Anonymous said...

Lets just say for argument's sake that their campaign cost 3 million of our fine English pounds.

Do you think upon reflection they think its money well spent? I mean informed people the world over already have a pretty dim view of secrective places like Jersey. A child sex scandal would have come as sadly little surprise.

As for the other 90% of the global population. Well they dont even know we exist!

Despite our golden banana.

Anonymous said...

Reply 2:58 I think you could easily treble that figure.

Anonymous said...

Today we introduce one the most Toxic Edifices in Jersey. This Toxic Edifice goes by the name of the "JERSEY EVENING POST" (JEP). This paper is a disgrace and a danger to Children who are in the care of the States of Jersey. This paper has failed the children of Jersey.

WHY?

Rico, did you not listen to the States yesterday. Read the SS blog and you might find the answer.

Anonymous said...

We need the same scrutiny, by the committee of Inquiry as was given to Mr. Harpers expenses.

The expenses incurred by the taxpayers in an attempt to silence and suspend Graham Power.

Ian Evans said...

NOTHING CHANGES

Anonymous said...

Is this a private discussion club or can anybody join in?

rico sorda said...

THE TOW TRUCK MAN

RS

Anonymous said...

"Commissioner Sir Christopher Pitchers, who presided at the hearing and ruled that it was possible for the three men to have a fair trial"

So why all the negative comments and press. Its like oh lets forget about the Abuse and nail Harper.

Is Pitchers trying to say that one press conference on the 12th November 2008 made everything ok? Its all just bullish*t.

The press conference and what they said was a load of old bullish*t

What an Island

voiceforchildren said...

Rico.

The Multi Million £ MINISTER

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

A reader says:

"Is Pitchers trying to say that one press conference on the 12th November 2008 made everything ok? Its all just bullish*t.

The press conference and what they said was a load of old bullish*t"

That is absolutely correct.

The press-conference given by Warcup and Gradwell was indeed notable for two striking features:

It was, is, and remains wholly without any precedent - in all of modern British policing. You will find no other example of where two years of existing detailed police work, are publicly destroyed by in-coming cops who have joined the inquiry.

The other fact is that, as the reader points out - what Warcup and Gradwell said was, indeed, "a load of old bullshit."

It was bullshit - quite obviously - even at that time. Even a reasonably informed lay-person could see that it was bullshit - and that Warcup and Gradwell had an awful lot of questions they should have been asked.

I wrote at the time, a detailed posting in which I asked some of the obvious questions. It can be read on my blog, in the archive, at 13th November 2008:

"37 Questions for Officers Warcup and Gradwell"

As many of us have observed - Judge Pitchers has an ever-growing range of questions he is going to have to answer.

For example - how come he so readily accepted - and allowed the court to be used as a PR vehicle for - a range of unchallenged - and manifestly wrong and dishonest - spin-doctoring?

Why did he passively accept such assertions - when so manifestly wrong and dubious were the claims of Warcup, Gradwell and Tapp - that even in the immediate wake of the infamous press-conference, a lay-person could pose so many obvious and serious questions?

In so many ways - it has to be asked - just what on Earth Judge Pitchers has been doing - during his time in Jersey's courts?

He eventually admitted, during my data protection appeal - after months of inappropriate refusal to declare such conflicting factors - that he had had dinner with Michael Birt and William Bailhache - once he had been chosen by them to be the judge who heard the child abuse cases.

Things aren't looking so good - are they?

Stuart

Ian Evans said...

A MIRROR IMAGE OF JERSEY

Anonymous said...

warcup gets Tapp to do a report so pervs can face trial this report gets given to the defence so the pervs cant face trial. The pervs face trial and everyone hails the report based on what exactly. This is worse than big brother.

Anonymous said...

Tapps report-Warcup

Kelletts report -Bdo/Gradwell

Warcup/Gradwell press conference on 12th November 2008

Gradwell leaking information - David Rose

No one arrested under Warcup/Gradwell

Gradwell trashes investigation at every possible chance

Gradwell doesn't give evidence

Warcup hasn't a clue what Gradwell is up to

The child abuse investigation under these two is a joke. it should be reopened now

Anonymous said...

(i) First in November 2008 the new senior investigation officer held a press conference in which he put the record straight about the findings under the building. That press conference received wide publicity and the tone of press reporting has changed, indeed the prosecution might now argue that they risk encountering jurors who believe that the Police have said that everything that had gone before was wrong. In my judgment this press conference went a long way to repair the damage that had been done by earlier press publicity.

Pitchers is doing himself no favors with this. What is he basing his reasoning on. One press conference full of rubbish and that make everything ok. I notice he doesn't mention the suspension of the Chief of Police. This is nothing but garbage. The real question is how and why have they been allowed to get away with it.

rico sorda said...

Matt Tapp -6 will be up this weekend.

What im doing is showing how this Media Consultants report was used in Court as given fact and from no other person than learned judge Pitchers.

This judge is referring to a report that has no background. Yet, as we have seen in the Syvret cases he has not allowed evidence from someone as high up as a former Chief of Police Graham Power. What is going on here?

In fact, Syvret cant get any evidence heard. Maybe he should have Matt Tapp as his Mackenzie friend.

This story has an explosive ending

Just keep following it

rs

Anonymous said...

You have got to remember that this man has been knighted.

Sir Christopher Pitcher.

Knighted for what?

Honesty?

rico sorda said...

I have just added another J peg at the top of the posting. This features Judge Pitchers and the Defence Lawyer Advocate Preston.

Look how the JEP feature Advocate Preston he gets half a page and he lost the case. If you slag Lenny Harper who cares if you loose the case the JEP don't give a hoot aslong as the Abuse Enquiry continues to be trashed.

rs

Anonymous said...

brilliant in depth work Rico, you're a machine

do you know when Tapp resigned and when his report was submitted?

KUTGW

cyril

rico sorda said...

Cyril, all will be explained. And I mean all of it.

rs

Anonymous said...

Rico have you looked at the front page Jpeg. Look at how they have played the wording.

Haut dela Graenne

then

Half truth and lies

Anonymous said...

Pensioner Gordon Claude Wateridge has been found guilty of eight counts of indecent assault and one count of assault.

He has been cleared of 12 other charges and will be sentenced on 11 September.

Detective Superintendent Mick Gradwell from States of Jersey Police read the following statement after the verdict.



‘Gordon Claude Wateridge, the first person charged in connection with the historical abuse enquiry, has faced trial at the Royal Court this week and as a result, has been found guilty of alleged sexual offences against young girls.

‘Gordon Wateridge, a house parent at Haut De La Garenne, was a sexual bully towards vulnerable young girls in his care.

‘We hope the complainants involved in this trial have received some comfort from the decision reached by the court.

‘I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the hard work and effort of the people involved in this case such as the investigation team, the witness liaison officers and the legal team, as well as the challenges the complainants have had to face both before and during this trial.

‘The historical abuse enquiry is continuing and there is another case in the court process. I am unable to comment about the investigation in wider detail at this time.’

‘We would like to emphasise that the States of Jersey Police take reports of historical abuse seriously, and are committed to investigating them,’ said Detective Superintendent Gradwell

And for good measure I have also leaked confidential material to David Rose & the Daily Mail, given a 3 part Interview to CTV, appeared in the Saturday interview of the jep, played a part in the suspension of the Chief of Police, discredited the Abuse Investigation at any given chance.

In Jersey thats 'OBE' material

Anonymous said...

Warcup,Gradwell & Tapp said no cellars only voids. So what do you make of this then?



4.1 Deputy T.M. Pitman of St. Helier of the Minister for Home Affairs regarding the number of alleged abuse cases relating to the cellars at Haut de la Garenne:
Would the Minister advise the Assembly how many of the 30 alleged abuse cases relating to the cellars at Haut de la Garenne are still part of the ongoing historic abuse investigations; how many, if any, are not being pursued, when was it decided to discontinue their investigation and for what reason?



Senator B.I. Le Marquand (The Minister for Home Affairs):
In answer to a question previously I indicated there were 30 such allegations. Those, in fact, were made not by 30 people but by 8 people. These were all properly investigated by the police, sometimes with the benefit of legal advice and none of these complaints passed the evidential test so as to warrant a prosecution.

4.1.1 Deputy T.M. Pitman:
Could the Minister clarify whether the former lead officer in the case, Mr. Gradwell - I do not believe I can avoid naming him - invited some of the Haut de la Garenne survivors to the police station to show them some examples of evidence, i.e. shackles that had been found in the cellars. If this is correct would this action not have made the evidence inadmissible in a court of law?

Senator B.I. Le Marquand:

I am unaware of any such occurrence. That does not mean I am saying it did not happen, I am simply not aware of it. I would have needed to have specific notice of such a detailed question.

4.1.2 Deputy T.M. Pitman:
Could I ask that the Minister seek out the information and report it back to me? Would that be possible, please?

Senator B.I. Le Marquand:

It would be helpful if I could have something precisely in writing so I know exactly what the question is, I am then happy to make inquiries.

4.1.3 Deputy M.R. Higgins:
Yes, if I could just follow up on the question. Is it usual in criminal cases for an investigating officer to show evidence such as the things that have been said in a criminal case to witnesses before they have gone into court?

Senator B.I. Le Marquand:

There are grave dangers in criminal investigations of police officers revealing too much detail which can subsequently contaminate the evidence of witnesses. That is a particular concern in all criminal investigations and therefore officers should be very careful not to lead witnesses in any way by providing them with information or showing them items in such a way that might contaminate their evidence.

4.1.4 Deputy F.J. Hill of St. Martin:
Will the Minister confirm that among the 8 people who made the allegations that one of them was made through an advocate? Will the Minister confirm?

Senator B.I. Le Marquand:

Again, I do not have that level of detail.

The Bailiff:

Deputy Pitman, final question.

4.1.5 Deputy T.M. Pitman:
Could the Minister clarify whether the whole media strategy surrounding the historic abuse inquiry was a Home Affairs strategy or a police strategy? If a police strategy, was the lead individual still overseen by the Minister?

The Bailiff:

It is not clear how that arises out of this question but, Minister, it is up to you if you want to answer.

Senator B.I. Le Marquand:

I am answering with some caution because I do not want to trespass into expressing an opinion in relation to disciplinary matters as Members will understand. But it is my understanding that the media strategy was a police strategy not a Home Affairs strategy. I could be wrong on that but that is my understanding

voiceforchildren said...

Deep questions REMAIN

Anonymous said...

Senator B.I. Le Marquand (The "Minister for Home Affairs):
In answer to a question previously I indicated there were 30 such allegations. Those, in fact, were made not by 30 people but by 8 people. These were all properly investigated by the police, sometimes with the benefit of legal advice and none of these complaints passed the evidential test so as to warrant a prosecution



Look, were there cellars or not? How come they are saying no cellars yet 8 cases didn't pass the evidential test from the (cellars). Is it just be who is confused here? was it 8 alleged cases in the Voids? But the Voids were two small for abuse. The AG said just because the cases didn't make court it didn't mean the abuse didn't happen.

WTF IS GOING ON HERE

voiceforchildren said...

Rico.

"When we had allegations of abuse in the cellars we were at a loss as to where these were or had been. Deputy Lewis very kindly came up to HDLG, described them to us and took us to the spot where we could access them. It was thanks to him that we found the cellars and all the teeth and children’s bones that we found in there – including those which the Anthropologist in Sheffield said were “fleshed and fresh” when burnt and buried. Why he did not come forward and contradict the obvious untruths in the now notorious press conference by Warcup and Gradwell, only he knows." From LENNY HARPER

Anonymous said...

Cellars, Voids? Is it really that important still? A void to a child would seem bigger logically don't you think?

voiceforchildren said...

A 7 foot void is not something one word describe as a CELLAR Unless of course your name is Le Marquand, Gradwell or Warcup!

rico sorda said...

"Cellars, Voids? Is it really that important still? A void to a child would seem bigger logically don't you think?"

They are important to the people who were allegedly abused down there - simple as that.

I will be blogging tomorrow

A lot of questions will be answered about Tapp

You will see why I started investigating this Media Consultant.

Tomorrow former Chief of Police Graham Power has he say

Don't miss it

rs

Damocles said...

Cellars, Voids? Is it really that important still? A void to a child would seem bigger logically don't you think?

You are missing the whole point.

The Warcup/Gradwell regime, at the press conference, described the space under the floor, choosing the word "voids" thereby giving the public the clear impression that nothing could have happened down there because the space was too small.

The impression was also formed in the public's mind that if the space was too small, then all the allegations of those who claimed to have been taken down there and abused must logically be lies or imagination.

Subsequently, as seen on Youtube Deputy Bob Hill showed that there was plenty of room down there.

What people have to decide is if the use of the word "voids" by Warcup/Gradwell was a deliberate attempt to steer the minds of the public away from the alleged abuse that happened down there or was just accidental verbal sloppiness.

Anonymous said...

HLG Child Abuse - Deputy Police Chief Lenny Harper - Freemason Coverup

Posted by 'ThenThereWere4'