Tuesday, August 5, 2014

JERSEY CYBER STALKER - PART 2 OUR STORY - GUEST POSTING








" CYBER STALKING 2"



"A GUEST POSTING"




"JON S HAWORTH"




"THE STALKER HIMSELF TELLS US HOW  HE KNOWS ABOUT MY TAX RETURN AND HOW HE IS GOING TO FCUK UP MY WIFE'S CAREER"





"HE ALSO STATES HOW HE GOT INFORMATION ON MY WIFE FROM DEPUTY SEAN POWER"





" JON HAWORTH IS IN SERIOUS DENIAL ONLINE"




"BEFORE WE BEGIN. LET US LOOK AT SOME OF HIS  QUOTES"




"Jon S Haworth Can we just stop talking about Rico? We all have him blocked, nobody knows his wife or appears to. Nobody knows about his tax problems, Nobody knows about anything so he is harassing people. Keep him blocked and forget about him."

June 12 at 9:48pm
· Like · 1



  • Jon S Haworth I really worry about the level of intelligence we are dealing with here MM.
  • Rico Sorda has written numerous hate posts about a trial I was in (that was none of his business) and then proceeded to insult me online over matters that had nothing to do with me and then has the nerve to call me a troll !
  • The Police know all about him, his postings and his behaviour since it started and Pitman is almost identical.
  • He tries to write an offensive post about me with a drunken picture of a man in the street which Evans did a few years ago and the Police look at that and wonder what he is all about.
  • He then tries to go online and play a victim.
  • Its like a pantomime in which they pretend their own blog postings attacking others don't exist.
  • Like one of Littlejohn's catchphrases - You couldn't make it up.

  • June 27 at 10:10pm
    · Edited · Like · 2
  • Jon S Haworth Oh I am wholly responsible for everything! I was even accused a month back of being involved in somebody's tax matters! I keep the Police apprised of all this lunacy and they always guess the right people behind it all, but boy it gets weird!
    July 4 at 8:42am · Like · 1


    James Pearce Sorda thinks he can use his blog to threaten you JH.
    3 hrs · Like




    Jon S Haworth Already know about it and reported it to the Police even though whatever he writes is just going to be a pack of lies anyway. I am sick and tired of telling his mate and him 2 months ago that I have nothing to do with the ****ing tax or any e-mails to wife. Its like talking to a brick wall and he needs to get into his thick head that since he made another stupid complaint to the Police about me 3 years ago that got nowhere he is supposed to stay away from me..
    2 hrs · Like



Jon S Haworth I have him blocked. I only speak to 1 blogger who has never insulted me online out of all of them but my time is getting tighter and like I said to our mutual friend, I have never seen his wife insulted online anyway. Maureen told him to stop blogging and start looking after her. I am seriously uninterested in his life. it means **** all to me.
2 hrs · Like



  • Jon S Haworth Thanks for the messages re: Sorda and his continued hate campaign and public threats, I have him blocked and he knows he should not even be attempting to contact me.
  • I will just carry on e-mailing them to the Police. It seems ironic that he is arguing with other people online for all to see yet I carry on getting blamed for it! I guess these are the limits he will go to trump up accusations that have no merit against me in order to honour a friend of his I won a case against. Such bitterness but let him carry on playing the jester, I have so many options if this carries on
    July 22 at 7:04pm · Edited · Like · 2

  • Jon S Haworth He should not be threatening anybody. He has it in his head that I've been stalking his wife??? He has been telling people that I will be in tears and he is going to do blogs about me etc. I 've already e-mailed the Police with more of these threats and I will be seeing them shortly with a view to taking things to another level. I am not putting up with this rubbish, its pathetic and nobody else should either. These bloggers and their use of the Internet to harass others are coming to an end anyway and besides, what good has it ever done for anybody?
    36 mins · Like
  • Jon S Haworth The Police said to me back in the Spring that the amount of abuse I have had to suffer online by bloggers has been unprecedented. They jokingly thanked me for taking the heat off them so if by any reason Higgins was targeting me with these claims its hypocrisy off the scale. I will say it again as was said to me 5 years ago, that these people cannot cope with other peoples freedom of speech and I think the Pitmans proved that when they were unable to cope with a satirical cartoon. I have actually advised people how to cope with this kind of thing by experience. I have kept up to speed with 3 States Members on a Cyber Insult Law, I even suggested it via a change to the Jersey Telecommunications Law in 2012. Its a long time coming but will be well received.
    Yesterday at 1:43pm · Like · 1
  • Jon S Haworth In my mind it is time he was charged with the online harassment of others. He is writing crap, again, on the back of a hunch and he has even admitted to stalking people online. I've dismissed all his ridiculous claims about tax and his wife in the past and have even gone so far as to raise his weirdness directly with the Police. Nothing further to add anymore because my conscience is clear that's for sure.
    13 hrs · Like · 1
  • Jon S Haworth Take his tax claim.
  • The Tax department get tip offs regularly but to actually get somebody pulled in you would need hard evidence or be in a powerful position to get them to act. He just cannot see that whoever is targeting him is much more powerful and influential than a member of the Public.
    1 hr · Like




 Today is just the first part of  looking at my family's "CYBER STALKER" Jon S Haworth.  As I stated in my previous posting, he crossed the line when he went for my wife.  I fully appreciate that my blogging activities will open me up to a degree of criticism, but this should not extend to my wife, or any other family member for that matter.  

Having got married in September 2013 and been away on honeymoon, I noticed my wife had become the topic of vile comments sent anonymously to my blog.   I decided to just ignore them at first as there were far more important things going on in our life.   My wife had become pregnant. Then, in a very short space of time, everything changed.

It was late October coming into November 2013 when I had a meeting with Voiceforchildren ("VFC"). We were having a chat about politics when he asked me about my blog and how it was going.  

I said "I am starting to get very annoyed at all the vile comments sent anonymously to my blog about my wife and, not only that, the person is also mentioning her place of employment  which means they are researching her". 
"That's strange" said VFC "I have had Jon S Haworth on the phone and he was mentioning your wife by name and where she worked." 
"You what" said I. "In what context could that man be mentioning my wife in a telephone conversation." 

VFC couldn't remember and then I made the decision. I supplied the equipment to enable VFC to record all their telephone conversations with Jon S Haworth. And so it began. From late October 2013 to the present day I have a recording of every phone call that was made. That is how I gathered my intelligence. Simple really. 


Jon S Haworth, I bet your jaw has just hit the floor. You are sat at home now thinking "what the hell have I said on the phone since October 2013?"  You have said plenty sunshine. 

My wife had, since falling pregnant, become very ill. We were into November 2013 and I was keeping the vile comments to myself. Also during this time I was aware that Jon S Haworth was looking into my wife. He had mentioned to VFC that he was getting his information from Deputy Sean Power. I decided to act. On 1st  December 2013 I did a blog posting called Blog Abuse 2. It was a shot across the bow at Mr Haworth. At the bottom of the posting I said quite explicitly stay away from my family. 

This part of the story will now be covered in the interview with VFC. 






I now want to move onto the very serious issue of our Income Tax Return. 

Jon S Haworth has stated he knows what I put on my income tax return. You can hear that quite clearly from the audio below. How serious is that He has contacts that can look into my Income Tax affairs. I want answers and I want the truth. I spent 4 hours with the Tax Department. It was very productive but we are all looking for answers.  He was so specific and I'm under no illusion that he has been disclosed information. 



Here you can listen to Jon S Haworth talking to VFC on the Phone. Listen to what he say's about our Tax and my wife. It is disgusting and toxic.


Audio can now be heard below. Youtube removed the above copy.



Is it just coincidence that when Jon Haworth was going on about fcuking up my wife's career with financial services their were fake profiles on  Politics Jersey Free Speech called James Pearce and Julie Hanning. ThIs is what they (He) posted. 

"James Pearce "Sorda is a hypocrite, wife working in finance whilst he promotes tax haven haters and I am surprised the JFSC have not been told about it. After all they fu**ing licence Trust Managers."
15 hours ago · Edited · Like · 1

Lawrence Byrne "I think someone has now Julie Hanning lol."
15 hours ago · Like


This is just the first part. 


I want everyone to listen to the Audio very carefully. 


Rico Sorda

Part Time Investigative Journalist 


(Protecting my Family)

109 comments:

Anonymous said...

After listening to the audio where he said he was going to fcuk up your wife's career shivers went down my spine so I can only imagine how your pregnant-sick-vulnerable wife must have felt after listening to it.

This is the sick side of social media the police should be doing something about and arresting Mr Haworth.

Anonymous said...

I am so sorry to hear what you and your wife have been put through by this man Mr Haworth and hope the audio recording will bring an end to it. My fear now is who is looking at my tax returns and why won't the tax department do anything about it?

Anonymous said...

OMG and I mean OOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMGGGGGG I've been watching this story unfold on Facebook and your blog where I have to confess I thought you were bluffing. You have delivered the goods Rico - sorry for doubting you- and sorry for what your wife has had to go through.

Anonymous said...

Fully agree with the previous commenter at 6.08; I also had begun to doubt you having watched this unfold for months. I'd not seen any evidence of this "Stella-fuelled nutcase" as he is described on various blogs... instead he has only made polite, sober, intelligent posts on Facebook and I'd started to think you, Ian, and Stuart had him all wrong.
Now this...WOW.
Sorry I ever doubted you... good work, Rico.
Do they still think you're a "crap" investigative journalist now??!

Anonymous said...

Genius Rico because you haven't provided the evidence this time Mr. Haworth has in the audio recording. He has a contact in the Tax office and that needs to be PROPERLY investigated. Love to you and your wife who should never have had to be put through any of this especially during a difficult pregnancy.

Anonymous said...

Rico, you're a very tolerant man. Many would have sorted this bloke out in a more traditional way.

Anonymous said...

Rico
If the tax department know who looked at your tax details and you know also who it is, has the person been sacked?

Could this person provide details of anyone else's tax details to the type of person wanting to silence or threaten someone?

Anonymous said...

VFC has played an absolute blinder here exposing this loon.

Anonymous said...

What Jon Haworth is doing here is prima facie criminal. 'Harassment', and multiple 'breaches of the Data Protection Law'.

A question for Jersey's law-enforcement system - if we actually have one: 'why has this man not been arrested, charged, prosecuted and jailed?'

We're waiting.

Anonymous said...

got him hook line & sinker mate

Anonymous said...

I also have evidence of Jon's odd behaviour. He messaged me about a young lady on fb and told me that she had a sexual transmitted disease. I will not go to the Police. I will be seeing Jon Howarth in court.

Anonymous said...

I am so sad for you and your wife Rico, how you both tolerate this creature is quite beyond my comprehension. If we had a police force that actually did anything about matters like this then the island would be a much better place to live. My best wishes to you both on your new baby.

Anonymous said...

I would say Deputy Sean Power has got as many questions to answer as Jon Howarth has. Will he be commenting?

Anonymous said...


With all due respect,this man is ill,he is suffering from a severe persecution complex that is complicated by what I perceive to be Querulous Paranoia,if unchecked this condition will worsen and will progress into a more serious maniacal condition,If anybody reading this knows this man or a close family member please advise him to seek help urgently.

Anonymous said...

What is the response from the police, if any Rico?

Anonymous said...

Rico, this is the guy who was given £100,000 to help silence Syvret and has history of making threatening drunken phone-calls and here he is doing it again! Why the hell haven't the cops arrested him? Glad to hear your wife is feeling better now after such trauma.

Anonymous said...

Rico, for every idiotic threat, I am sure that there are hundreds of well-wishers for yourself & your family. All the very best to you.

Anonymous said...

If the police have got copies of the audio why haven't they arrested him do we have to wait till the next blog to find out?

Anonymous said...

There is undoubted evidence now available proving that The Data Protection Dept., (and maybe others higher up), (even if they did not believin' him). Sponsored him purely for their own benefit, with our tax payers money....

But will they still be backing him now!?

Anonymous said...

How does haworth know that rico has no criminal record?

Anonymous said...

Answers are needed from the cops the tax department and Emma Martins should be asking the questions.

Anonymous said...

Seems clear as day to me that at least some Jersey officials continue to use this drunken troll thug to do their own sinister dirty work. They've been deluded in believing they could maintain their distance from his criminality, but the dirt on their hands is not the kind that washes away after being this visible. I hope you expose every one of the troll's protectors too, right through the ranks, for what they've done to your family and to the rule of law. Elle

Anonymous said...

How does this man get away with it. I take it this is the same man that made the drunken phone call in 2011, has learnt nothing in 2014 and has the Syvret blog shut down for causing him distress. He really is powerful.

Anonymous said...

Comment at 8:50 pm 'Rico, this is the guy who was given £100,000 to help silence Syvret and has history of making threatening drunken phone-calls and here he is doing it again! Why the hell haven't the cops arrested him?'

Yes this is him, Jon Haworth, so when you listen to him on the recording think what a good way of spending £100,000 of your tax-money it was, corrupting Jersey's law-enforcement system and making our political system like something out of North Korea in which opposition minded politicians who oppose the Glorious Leaders must now live in fear of being jailed by secret trials if they stand up to drunken lunatics who happen to be useful to the Establishment.

Trevor Pitman said...

Rico. The path you decided to follow with the assistance of VFC is fully justified. My heart goes out to your wife. You have been hugely tolerant. Having had Mr Haworth spread lies about my own wife to try and get at me I know something of how you must have felt - only more so given your wife's pregnancy. Numerous complainants have gone to the police regarding Haworth's sick actions and even as recently as last week. I know this for a fact because people were disgusted with lies he was now spreading about my own brother and our relationship. What I would stress is that serious questions now have to be asked politically about how Mr Bowron and AG Le Cocq have failed to apply the law over many years and many complainants! And that is putting aside for a moment the share in almost half-a-million pounds of taxpayers' money to take Stuart Syvret to court. Stay strong both of you. I repeat you have shown amazing fortitude and tolerance.

Anonymous said...

Don't kid yourself if you think there will be no retribution from this rs.

Anonymous said...

I might be wrong but I am sure he said on this phone call he does not blog himself, yet on facebook he has just said he has a blog of his own!

I have also seen on that same facebook page where he has been saying he doesnt or hardly ever drinks yet now he claims he was steaming in this conversation, must admit I thought he sounded drunk before reading his own comment.

He seems to have hoodwinked a couple of people on that page but having read a few comments from them I would say they are hardly the comments of intelligent beings.

Ex-Senator Stuart Syvret said...

Well, well, well.... *cracks knuckles* - this is going to be most interesting.

Very interesting indeed.

Seems to me some people have been most careless about choosing their factotums.

Almost as careless as the mistakes of the more senior factotums failing to have realised they themselves were factotums.

And mistakes like that have consequences.

"Consequences" - and inevitabilities from which there is no hiding place.

Stuart Syvret

Anonymous said...

Surprised so many people support this because Leveson condemned the use of pilfered telephone recordings in journalism and this actually scary what you've done and criminal.

Vsyn said...

I met you a few years ago and i didn't think you a liar then and I saw the craziness unfold on facebook and didn't believe it was a troll and I was right. that is disgusting behaviour and if we lived in any halfway democratic society he would have been arrested by now. I wish you achieve justice by pursuing legal action against him and all those that have assisted him. Why does nearly 400 pounds of my hard earned money go to fund this corrupt island every month? equally disheartened and disgusted. verity.

David Rotherham said...

Very interesting. I had thought it quite likely that a third party was hiding behind Jon's reputation, but now I have heard what he says in his own voice, I see why you are so sure it is him.

Anonymous said...

To say I'm shocked is an understatement and to think that the States Police have not acted on this information, despite questions in the house, is truly appalling.

And to think that you have only published a small amount of the information, and that there are presumably hours more of this stuff, is quite incredible.

What else does he say?
Who else does he incriminate?
How much longer before this goes unchecked in the MSM?

You have raised many important questions that are in the public interest.

Anonymous said...

What is most disturbing about this is that this lunatic has been enabled: a politician provides personal information about Rico's wife; an informant in the local tax office leaks details about Rico tax affairs; and, worst of all, a Data Protection Commissioner funds legal action to the tune of £100 000 to silence reporting of this lunatic's activities.

Tom Gruchy said...

Any interest expressed by our "elected States reps" in this?

Anonymous said...


Very interesting Rico and VFC, give enough rope then a person hangs themselves, but will this person end up in jail as you have opened a can of worms involving other States agencies who appear to supply this vile and malicious person including the tax department staff.

Lets look at the facts.

Started using multi aviators on PJ in 2008 as debumblebee, JTM, Jason the Maverick,Terminator 4 and many others. He has been banned at least six times for nasty comments, this was just the start ?

He was mentioned in court at Stuart Syvrets trial and then arrested and found guilty, receiving a police record for a damming recorded threatening nasty phone call to an innocent person and his family.

As a newly recorded criminal this was not enough for Emma Martins and her legal masters to dismiss him and went on “ to trust him " using his words against Syvret in all things a data protection trial.

His share of the cost ( taxpayer funded ) being a reported £100,00.

It gets worse, if he is to be believed ? he claims to have friends and know people and the evidence shows he as access to tax records and information in contravention of laws and ethics who is supplying him ?

When are the authorities going to use the data protection law, the law against defamation, the harassment law, and several others available to stop this piece of scum from operating freely in a civilised society. If nothing is done and he does not appear in court or JEP on charges, then clearly he is protected.

Rico and VFC have always done their level best to tell the evidenced truth. Lets see which way the authorities jump and if they take any meaningful action.

There is a file of complaints against Jon Sharrock Haworth, Jersey’s most malicious and nasty person at the police station.

Sean Power as a politician should resign today.


Anonymous said...

After hearing the telephone recording, it is chilling to know that the judiciary 'used' Jonathan Haworth's testimony to enforce a secret super-injunction to silence ex-Senator Stuart Syvret under the Data Protection Act.

Anonymous said...

NOT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST TO PROSECUTE!

Anonymous said...


A MAN who made a ‘sinister and evil’ phone call to the family housing former Senator Stuart Syvret was fined £200 by the Magistrate’s Court yesterday.

Jonathan Sharrock Haworth (40), of St Helier, told the court that he made the call after being spoken about in derogatory terms on an internet blog site.

He was bound over for six months, was fined £200 and was ordered to pay his victim – Mr Syvet’s landlord – £200 after admitting making the menacing call on 11 March.

It was not revealed in open court which blog site Haworth was referring to, but he said that an inaccurate entry on the site stated that he had been sacked from previous employment.

www.thisisjersey.com/2011/03/29/man-fined-for-response-to-blog-comments/

Anonymous said...

Not sure if my last comment went through ok - so here it is again.
Who pays for Howarth to spend all day writing malicious, diversionary guff which aims to crush the truth and confuse the masses into thinking that the likes of Rico, Stuart and others are all bad when the opposite has been evidenced and prooved time and time again? As far fetched as it may sound, I suspect pro-Establishment names are financially supporting him to do this.

Trevor Pitman said...

We certainly need a States question asked at next Sitting on the latest allegations against email thief 'politician' Deputy Sean Power.

His behaviour quite frankly should demand resignation as a reader comments. How will he play the 'victim' this time given his record?

This is the man of course who was also - in complete breach of the rules sending around our Planning Application whilst Chairman of the Applications Panel to his chums like Philip Bailhache and Kristina Moore who had nothing to do with it.

Frankly Power and Haworth were made for each other. But if he is innocent (I have proof he was involved in the old HDLG farce blog) then he needs to back Rico and his wife to the hilt and go with them down the Police Station.

Anonymous said...

Having now read the comments on the Facebook site, Politics Jersey With Free Speech, I am astounded that there are still some people who are looking to defend this guy?

Their failure to recognise the severity of his recorded comments, his generally appalling attitude and sheer vindictiveness, they prefer to focus on the fact you had the temerity to record him, and only because your wife was a victim of cyber stalking and cyber bullying - at a time when she was seriously ill and pregnant!

That to me speaks volumes for the mentality of these people. Truly despicable.

Anonymous said...

To Anonymous at 12:23 PM

Perhaps they are part of a club that swears to support each other no matter what ..

The Beano is not the Rag

Anonymous said...

I have just read on the politics facebook page the police will advise people to get along or ignore each other.

How is the data protection issue at the tax department an ignore issue?

Anonymous said...

Have just read on the politics facebook page the police are going to advise complainants to get along. How is the data protection issue at the tax department going to be dealt with?

Anonymous said...

Deputy Sean Power had to resign in disgrace, didn't he, from his job as Housing Minister over his theft and distribution of private data belonging to Deputy Carolyn Labey. Didn't Sean Power claim then not to know Jon Haworth and the blog Haworth ran?

I don't remember the exact details but it seems to me the new information here in which Jon Haworth states he's regularly in contact with Deputy Sean Power, that Sean Power's daughters feed Power information about other people's work places, and that Jon Haworth gives the orders to Sean Power, are all serious facts that should be brought to the attention of Deputy Labey.

Looks to me like this is new information that could put a very different slant on those events and how Sean Power & Jon Haworth were basically allowed to get away with it.

Keep up the good work. So many people I know across the Island are hoping you'll run for election Rico one day.

Anonymous said...

This awful man writes in many voices male and female, on many if not all the blogs including the msm, spitting out comments and vile accusations.

You can reconise his style after a while. For instance watch for " rs " when he writes referring to decent people like Rico Sorda or pretending to be him.

It is entirely feasible and probable that he is trying to defend his sick actions using his made up names.

Shrek.

Anonymous said...

Jon Haworth is on facebook telling people the police aren't going to prosecute the bloggers for these recordings...............Excuse me??????????????????? It's him who has been intimidating your wife and delving into your tax returns it's him who should be getting prosecuted not the bloggers for doing what the useless police should have been doing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Stuart, you're comment is very cryptic. Spit it out, man. What do these revelations mean for you, and what is that you're going to do about it?

Anonymous said...

Anyone who knows Jersey well will know this is how it works. Rico your experience is deplorable. But mild compared to some tales of the grinding island mill. As you well know. Wouldn't it be ironic if foul mouthed snotty OV vermin brought the annointed few back to earth with an almighty bump.

Damocles said...

Just a word of caution to keep it real. Just because someone (almost) claims to have access to peoples' tax records, have friends in high places, to have made complaints to the police and been advised a certain way etc etc doesn't necessarily mean that all (or any) of these things are true. It is entirely possible that the person in the phone call is just a master bullshitter who just makes up stuff.

In any event, people shouldn't use just these phone call claims to jump to any conclusions that "the establishment" support, care about or even know this person or his claims. To have someone on your side who speaks like this and who insinuates that he has friends in high places doing his will would surely be an embarrassment to anyone with their heads screwed on properly?

Anonymous said...


Rico

It is unimaginable how difficult your and your wife's and others lives have been for many years by this vicious and very sad cyber-bully Jon Haworth. He states to have unbelievable power due to his contacts in Jersey as he has been given sensitive information by them who can only have a serious high position like a politician or high ranking civil servant or their friends. This would be obviously criminal, if it is not in public interest.

As a regular Jersey visitor and not a resident here it makes no sense to me whatsoever that this previously convicted cyber-bully is able to continue for years his life-threatening verbal and written attacks without being prosecuted and jailed.

As I have only been reading the Jersey blogs for a couple of years and for other non-resident Jersey readers, would it be possible to give a synopsis of the link between Jon Haworth, Stuart Syvret, Emma Martins, the historical child abuse enquiry and the establishment in order to get a bigger picture of what has made this ill person to start off his malicious cyber trolling and why this man, who would have been jailed in the UK, has free reign in Jersey ?

If the judiciary of Jersey is not acting now on your evidence then this would clearly prove that Jon Haworth is indeed protected by high ranking powerful people of Jersey's establishment.

rico sorda said...

I told Mr Haworth today that I want the truth. I'm sick of it. He knows how I feel. We spoke for 40 minutes and knows I'm not taking this sh*t anymore.

I will see how this pans out over the coming weeks. I want the truth.

I will have Part 3 up on sunday

In Part 3 you will get to see the real picture emerging.

Someone told him about my tax. That is quite clear from the audio. He said he guessed. Bullsh*t.

Why should Jon take all the sh*t if there are others involved.

rs

Anonymous said...

'Damocles' are you new to these stories? You kind of must be to have made that comment 9:04.

As far as Jon Haworth's 'claims to have access peoples' tax records' goes, make no mistake about what Haworth has said and what others have said about what Haworth has said. Haworth knows, and this is very specific data NOT written on Rico’s tax return, that Rico has not written he’s an 'investigative journalist'. Haworth also knows the summed entries on Rico's tax return, because Haworth has said of Rico, 'but he’s not actually put that on his tax return AND he's not actually put there zero money.'

Those are very exact examples data knowledge claimed by Haworth, and that is what the posting says Haworth has claimed.

These are very, very serious issues.

But the rest of your comment, Damocles, makes me ask if you're just a troll, when you say stuff like, 'In any event, people shouldn't use just these phone call claims to jump to any conclusions that "the establishment" support, care about or even know this person or his claims. To have someone on your side who speaks like this and who insinuates that he has friends in high places doing his will would surely be an embarrassment to anyone with their heads screwed on properly?'

Sorry? Have you been paying no attention at all? It's already known that Jon Haworth is the man who was so connected with the establishment that they let him off, along with Deputy Sean Power, of handling stolen personal data, running hate campaigns for years, and criminally harassing people for years.

It’s known that Jon Haworth has been allowed to get away with stalking vulnerable single women. It’s also known he's been immune to dozens & dozens of complaints to the police from loads of different people, that he has also been given protection to break the data protection law as many complainants against him could say. It’s known that he makes maybe 100s of drunken abusive threatening telephone calls to many different people and that he makes death-threats to people only for one of which to get taken to court and even then the police woman in court stood and lied by agreeing 'no other offences or similar complaints were outstanding’ when asked to verify Haworth’s defence claims. Some of us were there in court that day and saw that with our own eyes.

But then we get the £100,000s of public money that’s been spent by the establishment, probably a lot more than that really, on a secret trial to have Stuart Syvret jailed.

You’re joking, Damocles if you want us to take your comments seriously when you say ‘the establishment don’t’ know or support Jon Haworth’?

Jersey’s Data Protection Commissioner Emma Martins agreed that £100,000s of public money could be spent on behalf of Jon Haworth on a secret trial against Stuart Syvret. And that’s been shown to be the case by many States questions when the few good Sates members tried to question how on Earth this could have happened.

Get real Mr Damocles, you’re trying to have a laugh with us. Or you’re a troll.

rico sorda said...

You are bang on about the tax. It is so specific. He wanted it been known that he new. He was absolutely correct. I didn't declare it. I have been offered payment in the past for my work but have always refused due to the topic.

Rs

Damocles said...

Anon at 10.46.

Sorry Anon, you're being a bit dense. It's because I'm familiar with this story long term, and the way the Jason, Jon, James, Percy, Sue etc character behaves, that I'm pointing out that a couple of lucky guesses amongst a whole host of vague ambiguous fluff is nowhere near real evidence of any inside knowledge.

When someone whose posts had the same grammatical characteristics and phraseology as the multi-avatared one had a go at me, a few years ago, most of their stuff was completely wrong. It got a couple of things vaguely right but if you accuse others of multiple things, like firing a shotgun, you will probably get close to one or two targets just by accident.

With your credulity Anon, if you think one lucky strike is hard evidence, don't ever go to any shows where self-described psychics demonstrate cold reading of an audience otherwise you're going to think they have mysterious powers!

Anonymous said...

There's a fundamental point which should be made, and which is worth making in particular response to the reader Damocles, who derides the very idea that the type of person who appears in the recording would ever be part of the plans of the establishment.

When listening to the recording of Jon Haworth, it is clear that the man is of limited intelligence, is toxically sociopathic, easily deluded and self-deluded, and that he has been led to believe of himself that he's important and that he has the support of the powerful.

So, is that not, in an obvious sense, a summary of the ideal candidate a powerful establishment syndicate would choose to be one of their "mugs"? A perfect type of candidate to be recruited and brought along to do the "dirty work" - the obviously sleazy, disgusting and apparently illegal dirty work - that no official part of the establishment could do, and which no person with any brains would do?

And if such a plan by a corrupt establishment went wrong and their "patsy" were to be exposed, well, a) they're a disposable irrelevancy, b) the establishment itself is unaffected, and c) the individual concerned is so obviously a fantasising, paranoid, drunken gutter-dweller that no-one will believe the establishment could possibly have had any involvement with him.

It seems to me that that is the situation we have here.

My explanation could be dismissed - were it not for the actually quite exceptionally dramatic evidenced history of this Jersey situation - involving as it does a secret trial - the very first in British history - brought partly in the name of Jon Haworth and funded by Data Protection Commissioner Emma Martins - to silence and jail a former Jersey Senator.

That kind of evidence, it seems to me, does not go away.

Damocles said...

Anon at 12.39 "here's a fundamental point which should be made, and which is worth making in particular response to the reader Damocles, who derides the very idea that the type of person who appears in the recording would ever be part of the plans of the establishment"

Now you're making stuff up. I didn't deride the idea at all. I merely pointed out that those who are fastening on to a few ambiguous straws as if they were smoking gun evidence showing massive corruption are barking up the wrong tree. Any organised establishment corruption would be incredibly stupid to use a proven convicted loose-lipped unstable character to "do their work".

If you use the ramblings of this sad but irritating character as evidence that there is a big sustained plot by some black hats, then you need to think again.


Anon at 10.46 "Jersey’s Data Protection Commissioner Emma Martins agreed that £100,000s of public money could be spent on behalf of Jon Haworth on a secret trial against Stuart Syvret"

Not good at analysis are you? Is that why you presented a distorted view of what actually happened? The trial was on behalf of four people, of which Howarth was a very minor part, just included to bump up the numbers. The meat of the trial was what Stuart wrote about Danny Wherry and David Minty but in particular about "Nurse M" and SS's publishing of police reports about him. Now whether there was a justified public interest in doing so is irrelevant. I believe SS was right to publish the Nurse M stuff but not right to infer from it a massive establishment corruption "tensegrity" structure. My own view is that some individuals had or have less than perfect integrity but not the organisations as a whole that they work for.

The point is, Anon@10.46, the trial was not set up to protect Howarth, he was a very minor individual in it so you shouldn't use the trial as even fragmentary evidence that Howarth works for or is protected by the establishment.

As I said initially, try to keep it real and dial down the paranoia because it only damages the overall case for reform in Jersey and allows those unfamiliar with the material to write you off as worthless conspiracy theorists.

Anonymous said...

"rico sorda said...
I told Mr Haworth today that I want the truth. I'm sick of it. He knows how I feel. We spoke for 40 minutes and knows I'm not taking this sh*t anymore.

I will see how this pans out over the coming weeks. I want the truth.

I will have Part 3 up on sunday

In Part 3 you will get to see the real picture emerging.

Someone told him about my tax. That is quite clear from the audio. He said he guessed. Bullsh*t.

Why should Jon take all the sh*t if there are others involved.

rs"

Rico, even after so many hours of phone calls this got nowhere, so what will change now? I did guess that you had not mentioned this on your tax form, seriously, and I do not know the source of the firm that sent e-mails to your wife. How many more times do I have to say, I don't know who is ultimately responsible?

But after these blogs any 3rd party would never say a thing, surely you can see that yourself, because would you?

I have no idea how you expect me to react to such online abuse against my character at the moment. Anonymous cowardly comments written about me feels like being back in a teenage playground.

If you want me to take you seriously its all going to have to calm down. I refuse to be bullied and threatened into discussions with you and several people are saying to me that these are personal issues and not public ones. Don't shit on your own doorstep for gods sake.

JH

Anonymous said...

Well I have to come out somewhat in support of Damocles. First of all Ive seen him around a few times and commenting and don't see any evidence of being a troll.

But to the main point, I agree with him that listening to the audio very carefully and several times, it could be theoretically possible that Jon has made a few educated guesses and struck lucky. No doubt about it hes a loathsome individual, with an unhealthy obsession with some peoples lives, a fantasist, and potentially a little dangerous if this continues to escalate. It would be good to hear the view of a lawyer use to defending people in open court, and see how they would play this. Any views anyone?

Having said all of that what I don't fully understand Rico is the discussions you had with the tax department. Can we be absolutely clear on what they told you please.

They were able to establish who at their office has accessed your file, and on what dates (if this is electronic there will be an audit trail I'm sure). What they cannot tell is which one of those people potentially shared information, correct? Jon'y boy says that he got information from a third party, which may or may not have been Power correct. In reality he may have, and would argue in his defense that he, struck lucky and guessed. As far as I can tell you cannot prove the link beyond doubt without Jon confirming a name of his source and further investigation. That of course is never going to happen unless you get him on a really drunken call ranting again. That appears to be the position to me and that's how it would play out in a court of law. Is this correct, or how do you think the case is proved more strongly than I see it above?

Rico you say that VFC said to you "That's strange" said VFC "I have had Jon S Haworth on the phone and he was mentioning your wife by name and where she worked." So what exactly did he say to VFC that time that was not yet being recorded?

Rico I'm not doubting you, I believe that this idiot is sadistically targeting you and you wife. However I'm playing devils advocate here to make sure you case is water tight. I also don't doubt that the subsequent calls recorded have even more damning evidence, and I'm looking forward to those. Please confirm that that is the case.

Like Damacles I'm now up for attack as a troll. I can assure you I'm not. What I am interested in though is seeing hard undeniable facts not subject to a defensive interpretation that would stand up in a court of law.

Common sense and the weight of material against Jon'y boy says your right Rico, and I agree with that but can you or anyone else prove it beyond all reasonable doubt?

JRCbean

PS Ive seen Jon'y boy referred to as a psychopath, which I am pretty certain he is not, having studied that condition for other reasons. I do wonder though whether he has some other mental disorder, or personality defect though and that this also could offer some explanation as to why the authorities do nothing about him. My experience of dealing with a psychopath is that once a court or public institution has been informed (always off record, never recorded) of this diagnose they will do everything possible in their power not to confront that issue in open discussion. They are on a hiding to nothing if they do. Right or wrong they could be sued for ruining someones life by stigmatizing them with that label going forward.

Wrong and they are definitely in the frame. Right and they have still ruined that person future but giving them that label and are exposed for that reason.

Why do I think this? Because Ive seen it happen!

Anonymous said...

' Someone told him about my tax. That is quite clear from the audio. He said he guessed. Bullsh*t.
Why should Jon take all the sh*t if there are others involved '.

Fair point, Rico. You see Jon is just someone who knows a few people and then can't keep that to himself. Next thing he's on the troll juice (Stella), and getting himself into trouble on the internet all over again.

He's probably just really bored and in serious need of a full time job. I wouldn't let him get to you, as far as i'd be really irritated to know that supposed data protection is obviously being breached by the likes of people who are supposedly paid to keep that info safe from the likes of joe public, ie, 'regular' Jon.

Rico, your stance is obviously fair, professional, and looking to the bigger picture.

rico sorda said...

"They were able to establish who at their office has accessed your file, and on what dates (if this is electronic there will be an audit trail I'm sure). What they cannot tell is which one of those people potentially shared information, correct? "



I had 4 meetings with the Tax Department.

I met with Mr Le Cuirot and a lady from HR.

I played them the Audio. They took it very seriously. They said they had checked the system and new who had accessed my file. I asked them for the names. They said no. They couldn't as that would have been against Data Protection issue.

My instinct is telling me that someone told him this. I know Jon. It's been a long 5 years. I don't say this because I want a drama. They said if I could supply them with a name they would check it against the system.

I don't believe Jon's denial. At the moment he denies everything. Remember, this man was used in closing down the Syvret blog. When you hear that he is looking into not just my wife but her family it all starts making sense.


"Rico you say that VFC said to you "That's strange" said VFC "I have had Jon S Haworth on the phone and he was mentioning your wife by name and where she worked." So what exactly did he say to VFC that time that was not yet being recorded?"

VFC had told me that Jon had mentioned my wife and her place of work. I acted right then as I just knew where this would be heading. I had been in contact with Deputy Power right up until going to press. I asked him if he wanted to write something he said no. He said that Mr Haworth was a fantasist but would come down the police station and make a statement if required.

I want JH to start telling the truth. I want to know what the last 5 years have really been about. Until I get that I keep on telling our story.

More can be found here.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/378602222238338/

Thank you for the comments.

Anonymous said...

Why has this man not been arrested, why has the Deputy not been suspended, whoops forgot *This is Jersey* island of secrecy corruption with beautiful scenery..............

Anonymous said...

Rico, a lot of these comments are breaking data protection, I've had that confirmed this morning.
Now I don't want to start serving you with orders because I think you can agree yourself that a lot of the personal insults on here are not only highly offensive but totally unnecessary. I've also been advised that we cannot carry on talking whilst such behaviour is going on. If we talk on the phone I do not expect you to then write on here that I talk shit. Its hardly going forward is it?

Please re-look at this blog and decide for yourself whether a free for all to slag me off is actually helping.

Regards

JH

Anonymous said...

I don't get it. If I were an amateur artist, painting for the joy of it but never earning a penny from it, but ran a blog and called myself an artist - would I have to declare that on my tax form with £0 as my annual earnings?

I doubt it very much, so why is this even an issue that you declare yourself a journalist for an activity you do, unpaid, in your spare time? Why would this even occur to JH? I don't even understand why it would occur to anyone at the Tax Dept but the only thing that might make sense is that it did occur to someone there, and then they mentioned it to JH (directly or indirectly) and then it excited his odd mind and he was thrilled to mention it to VFC in one of the hours of weird phone calls.

Rico, as usual, is by far the most believable, here.

Anonymous said...


A connection to the establishment.

Jon Haworth has told several people including me, that he has discussions with Philip Ozouf. Check ages and schools attended, for possible connection.

rico sorda said...

Which comments fall under data protection?

Also, when you met my wife this morning you blamed Neil.

Let us start with the truth.

Let us begin right now

Anonymous said...

Thanks for clarifying Rico, and I really do feel sorry that you have had to put up with this shit from him.

"I asked them for the names" Names plural so they could not pin it down to one person. That's a real shame, because you cant make the link 100% without Jon being man enough to divulge it, which is never going to happen. I don't doubt your hunch but point is it would not stand up in court unfortunately.

Hang in their Rico and continue with your considered and well thought through approach. I suspect that Jon will never take the sensible approach and will continue with his invincible attitude. More fool him.

JRCbean

Anonymous said...

I commented last night against what I think is trolling by Damocles. And maybe Damocles doesn't even know he's trolling, one definition of which is carrying on repeating the same point when its already been beaten.

Damocles is just repeating stuff. but he has no answer to the evidence and the history of this case. The key fact of which, Jon Haworth has been on many occasions actually protected, in really serious and deliberate ways, by the Jersey authorities. Protected in ways that some mere drunken troublemaking bullsh*tter would never ever be. An ordinary member of the public wouldn't receive the kinds of protections Haworth has been given, never mind a member of the public with a history of harassment and making trouble.

Like I said yesterday, your having a laugh Mr Damocles if you think the facts and history can be skated over.

And like another reader has explained much better than I could, if the Establishment actually wanted a 'patsy' to do the dirty and illegal work, who better than a drunken fool like Haworth who when he gets caught, people can come onto sites like this and say, 'oh, well, maybe he guessed a few things, but look at this loon? He obviously didn't have state protection.'.

But he did. Rico, I think Damocles is a troll because if they weren't a troll their comments would be facing the facts not trying to skate over stuff that won't now go away, and can't now be played down as Damocles is trying to do.

And as though things weren't clear enough already, you tell us today that you Rico had meetings with the Income Tax Department, and they have tracked down whoever accessed your private file.

What more do we need? I vote we move this talk forward because carrying on answering the same trollings from Damocles diverts you and supporters, Rico, from focusing on the important issues that come out in all of this.

There is important work to do, like, do any of the bloggers & campaigners have a file on the questions and answers in the States of every time the few good members tried to question how and why Jon Haworth had had £100,000s of tax payers money spent by the Data Protection Commissioner Emma Martins to silence Stuart Syvret and be 1 of the 4 who were used to bring a secret trial against Syvret?

It would a good time to get stuff like that together, now, and compare it with the latest revelations about Haworth, not so much to focus on him as that too could end up just diverting a lot of people, but on the establishment, and why they have protected Haworth, and fed Rico’s private data to him.

Anonymous said...

7:03 JH Sean Power has come to me and asked me about what's going on?
7:27 Rico is not even a registered journalist
7:32 Because my contacts his not even put it on his tax return either his not earning any money he signs of all his emails saying I'm an investigative journalist
but his not actually put that on his tax return and his not actually put on there zero money

7:49 I know, because I've asked people to look into it if people start attacking me online like he does I will make I will raise questions in areas he doesn't even
know I can go.
8:33 What I will say is that his wifes career is fucked completely. I know people that have contacted financial services about her job
11:48 I will support anything that fucks up his wifes position in her trust firm purely because I think he is a wanker

How can the caller go on to say its nothing to do with him?

Anonymous said...


Getting back to Jon Sharrock Haworth own words on the recorded telephone call, when asked why ?he retorts " for revenge ". This is after clearly saying if " Rico wants a game I will give him one ".

The words are from JHaworth's own mouth.

Is the earth moving for you now Jon ? is the game you threatened now getting to hot to handle as Rico has bravely gone public showing you to be a vile coward for all of Jersey to hear and see.

People are not that stupid, and your intentitions to get at, long suffering Rico and his wife, are now on public display. You need a knock on your door from the authorities and a holiday in a secure cell.

Game set and match bozo.

Anonymous said...

Jon Haworth needs to be taken - many years overdue I acknowledge - back to court. But this time to answer for all of the people he has bullied and abused while hiding behind his many avatars. If the police will not act then I suggest approaching a States member (we still have a couple of good ones) to lodge a proposition citing a vote of no confidence in the Chief of Police and/or Data Protection Commissioner. Quite possibly the Attorney General too. These would be lost obviously what they would achieve would be to get the failings in the public arena where they need to be.

Anonymous said...

This chap Jon Haworth is something else.

He turns around and says on facebook, " i dont have grudges against anyone".

Is he serious...?? just listen to him talk .

Anonymous said...

Rico - you have handled this very sad and sorry saga in the most honourable manner, which is nothing less than would be expected of you.

I remember posting a comment when JH had been to court for the death threats against a thoroughly decent couple who had offered Stuart Syvret a roof over his head, that it was a shame that the perpetrator had not been ordered to undertake psychological help which he clearly needed and still needs.

That aside - I find it inconceivable that Deputy Power has not sought to deny the allegations against him because if it were me I would have made damned sure that were they fake I would have wanted to distance myself from this very quickly!

Anonymous said...

Jon Haworth 'hasn't got a grudge against anyone'!!!!!! Is this bloke for real? just look at his obsessive attacks on Syvret, Harper, Pitman and just about anyone who dares praise what Harper and Graham Power tried to do on behalf of the abuse victims. Talk about being in denial!

Anonymous said...

As a commenter says, "just look at his obsessive attacks on Syvret, Harper, Pitman and just about anyone who dares praise what Harper and Graham Power tried to do on behalf of the abuse victims."

That is what this comes down to, is it not? This is an obviously disposable cretin who has been empowered and used as an implement by which to attack anyone aligned to the cause those men did so much to fight for.

Jon Haworth is, to employ a euphemism, the shitty end of a stick by which Jersey's Crown apparatus has attempted to fend-off those who were fighting on behalf of the Island's child abuse victims.

But I'm hopeful this time Britain's vulnerable children are going to win.#CSAinquiry

rico sorda said...

I can assure everyone that I'm not stopping until I get to the truth or as close to it as possible. Jon knows how I feel. We spoke on the phone for 40 minutes. The days of thinking you can just talk garbage are over. I want the truth.

Yesterday, by pure chance, I was in town with my wife and child and we bumped straight into Mr Haworth.

We stopped. I pointed him out to my wife. He came across to us. The first thing I said was (Is there something you want to say to my wife - ref Fucking up her career) Jon said "you weren't meant to hear any of it. It was a private phone call. It's all Neil's fault. And I have been onto Data Protection you had better remove things" I said (conversation over).

You see this is why I have an inferno burning inside me. Im calm. Very calm. Always am. But that doesn't mean I will just let things go.

I stop at the truth

RS

rico sorda said...

i Have asked Deputy Sean Power for a reply as I though he would like to get his view across. He has decided to stay out of it. Onwards I go.

rs

Anonymous said...

I only just listened to the tape.
Wow.
Speechless.

Anonymous said...

Sean Power's silence speaks for itself.

Nuff said!

Anonymous said...

I'm researching the child-abuse cover-ups in Jersey and moderately fresh to the scandal. The blogs are a wonderfully good source of history and evidence. Congratulations to you bloggers who've been with this story and worked on it from the beginning.

I am doing a lot of back-reading, but I might have missed some important postings on some of the blogs? I'm a bit confused at something I read in these comments, and wondered if you or readers to point me (us) to the right links?

The comment of August 7th, at 1:27 AM, says,

“Not good at analysis are you? Is that why you presented a distorted view of what actually happened? The trial was on behalf of four people, of which Howarth was a very minor part, just included to bump up the numbers. The meat of the trial was what Stuart wrote about Danny Wherry and David Minty but in particular about "Nurse M" and SS's publishing of police reports about him. Now whether there was a justified public interest in doing so is irrelevant. I believe SS was right to publish the Nurse M stuff but not right to infer from it a massive establishment corruption "tensegrity" structure. My own view is that some individuals had or have less than perfect integrity but not the organisations as a whole that they work for.

“The point is, Anon@10.46, the trial was not set up to protect Howarth, he was a very minor individual in it so you shouldn't use the trial as even fragmentary evidence that Howarth works for or is protected by the establishment.”

Could someone tell us which postings we can find those details in please? I’m particularly interested in reading about how the Jersey authorities viewed those four people, and which of them they considered to be the most important, and how and why they came to that ranking.

Thanks.

Anonymous said...

It would be genuinely amusing if this turd really did contact the data protection commission, and really was told your blog was in breach of the law.

Because, let's face it, they have well and truly shot their bolt when it comes to censoring the internet. They got in way over their heads with Stuart Syvret and revealed themselves to be the enemies of civil society they really are, breaking and twisting the law to achieve their ends. Fighting the causes of criminals in an attempt to silence one of the few public voices seeking justice for the vulnerable.

Quite a few people in public office in Jersey left their arses hanging out over the treatment they gave Stuart, and they must know there will be a reckoning somewhere in their future.

I very much doubt they have the stomach for a second fight of this nature.

Anonymous said...

Saw Fluffy Bowran walking into town for his daily appearance to the public....

He doesn't seem to have a care in the world.

Anonymous said...

A great piece of investigative journalism by the Voice in assisting you and your lady wife with this exposure of a very sick and twisted bully. I well remember Haworth's destruction of Planet Jersey with his multiple avatars and insulting flaming of genuine commentators. You can also find this troll writing bile under the avatar Real Truthseeker, especially on the Jersey Evening Post on line. I honestly believe he is unable to stop even given how your exposure has him being ridiculed and condemned for what he is. I think he simply must have something in his make up that causes him to enjoy trying to hurt people no matter how sick the lies.

Anonymous said...

Fluffy might have a care soon thanks to Rico and his colleague with all of this research. he is effectively allowing bullies to harass people at will.

Anonymous said...

Hasn't Data Protection Law and your Information Commission fallen into unsalvageable disrepute?

Looking at events from over here it's amazing the Data Protection Commissioner didn't take 'the package' and sail off into the sunset at least two years ago. Presumably she's attempted to negatioate a fat 'retirement'/'golden handshake' deal to escape from the situation?

The only reason she's still there, getting deeper and deeper into the crises, can be because Jersey's establishment have refused to pay her off, and won't let her resign and go as David Warcup and Bill Ogley were able to do with full final salary pensions and golden-handshakes?

Any moderately intelligent person can see what this is, and how it all ends, so wouldn't still be in this post, let alone as things decay yet further.

I suppose it's indicative of the contempt the Jersey Establishment have for women that the likes of Ogley and Warcup were given their payments and nothing further asked of them once the dirt on their hands reached a certain pitch, but a similar escape-route is refused to Emma Martins?

Anonymous said...

Comment at 6:01.
It stands to reason that the most important would be Nurse M. The least important would be JH.
DW & DM are as important as each other because they both would sing like canaries if they had to.

rico sorda said...

Like I say all I want is the truth. I told the police exactly that today and so much more. I have had enough. More on this story on sunday.

rs

rico sorda said...


I certainly don't believe that Jon should be ridiculed. There are, I believe serious issues behind this. I have knocked back many comments that have just attacked him and I don't want that.

I refuse to go down to the level that we, as a family, have been subjected to.

I'm just not taking garbage from Jon or the Police anymore. It's gone on long enough.

rs

Anonymous said...

I hope no one is going to try and play the feminist card in mitigation of Emma Martins?

As right as that comment is about the ingrained contempt the powerful men of Jersey have for women, she's known exactly what she was doing from the very start of all this. Not least helping stop rapists like my attacker from being brought to justice.

Anonymous said...

Can I ask a reasonable question without being accused of trolling?

Why is this Haworth character apparently not being charged by the police.

Anonymous said...

"Can I ask a reasonable question without being accused of trolling?

Why is this Haworth character apparently not being charged by the police."

Because they illegally tapped a phone call and its not directly to Rico or his wife so it fails under Telecommunications Law.

Sometimes you nose through the keyhole and regret what you see but Jon claims Rico has been provoking him for years so there is more to this story than Rico is telling his readers.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for this answer to my question, "Comment at 6:01.
It stands to reason that the most important would be Nurse M. The least important would be JH.
DW & DM are as important as each other because they both would sing like canaries if they had to."

I thought though that there must be more actual specific information in the public domain because the OP said, "The trial was on behalf of four people, of which Haworth was a very minor part, just included to bump up the numbers. The meat of the trial was what Stuart wrote about Danny Wherry and David Minty but in particular about "Nurse M" and SS's publishing of police reports about him."

The original poster of that comment of August 7th, at 1:27 AM clearly knows & has cited specific facts, such as the identities of 3 of the 4. But more significantly the OP knows the "ranking" approach given to the 4 by the Jersey establishment, and the strategic thinking behind that decision.

That's why I ask the question. The OP obviously knows the "inside" facts of what was a secret trial process & the strategic planning of it, so wondered where they had read this information?

Any further help appreciated, thanks.

Fingering the Jersey Nazi Party #1 said...

@11:59 "Why is this Haworth character apparently not being charged by the police"?

I will attempt to offer information in answer to that question using several comments as I am unsure of which pieces of information will be unsuitable for publication on this blog

I expect that Mr. Sorda is (and has been) asking the same question, and I expect that this will be part of the subject of some future blog postings.

I think that the short answer is that the island's politically controlled Jersey Police and judiciary etc. do their darndest to only investigate, charge and prosecute people who are critical of the establishment.
It seems that portions of the establishment are more than happy to use Mr. Haworth and even leak data to him.

Fingering the Jersey Nazi Party #2 said...

@11:59 "Why is this Haworth character apparently not being charged by the police"?

Mr. Haworth has in the past been charged and CONVICTED for similar behaviour.

The JEP even did a short but tame piece on his previous conviction, which used to be available online at
www.thisisjersey.com/2011/03/29/man-fined-for-response-to-blog-comments/

The JEP has since seen fit to remove this record of the activities of one of their pet trolls.

Fingering the Jersey Nazi Party #3 said...

@11:59 "Why is this Haworth character apparently not being charged by the police"?

The content of the JEP censored page www.thisisjersey.com/2011/03/29/man-fined-for-response-to-blog-comments/

can still be read by clicking on my name or going to :

http://therightofreply.blogspot.com/2012/04/another-reminder-of-jerseys-freaks.html

together with a copy of the newspaper cutting and the youtube audio of one of his death threat phone call that was recorded.

Fingering the Jersey Nazi Party #4 said...

@11:59 "Why is this Haworth character apparently not being charged by the police"?

A good question indeed.
We await Rico's further information and thoughts on this.

Aparently Mr. Haworth has been a menace for years, but because he is on the establishment's "side" he seems to be assisted and to be virtually immune to the normal repercussions for his actions.

Mr. Haworth's previous court conviction for similar behaviour very nearly didn't happen.
Again the evidence was undeniable because it was recorded but unbelievably the establishment was planning to deal with their pet troll's death threats merely with a 'telling off' at Parish Hall level.
Mr. Syvret however highlighted the existence of the taped death threats against a man's family as witness intimidation in one of the show trials against him and his public interest disclosures Ref protection of children and vulnerable islanders.

The establishment shysters could not risk their thug scuppering such an important show trial so they quickly had a rethink and charged Haworth .....but treated it as an "isolated incident" and gave him a slap on the wrist.

Anonymous said...

Comment at 11:59 say, 'Can I ask a reasonable question without being accused of trolling?

Why is this Haworth character apparently not being charged by the police.'

Why not recast the question if you want to get a real understanding of the 'Jersey Way', and ask, 'if it was Stuart Syvret who had been recorded acting in that way, would he have been granted bail yet or would he still be held on remand awaiting trial?'

Anonymous said...

I know this has little to do with Ricos horrendous battle with jersey's scum ruling hirachy but in the early 2000s I asked data protection to investigate housing and social security exchanging emails Which contained false personal details which resulted in my payments of sickness benifits being stopped without notice and housing breaking into my States flat to change the locks and eventually being forced into leaving my family in Jersey before I committed criminal acts which would have seen me in prison on a life sentence for multiple murders they had reduced me to a physical and mental reck. Data protection refused to investigate after enquiries at both departments in fact they barred me from their office and ignored me totally. I approached the police and was in plain English told to go away. If there was a true legal aid system I would have sued them all but again I was told they would not even consider my case. Jersey is a society run by little Hitlers. If my family lived elsewhere I would have gone to the papers in England and forced this group of rats to take me to court but as with any decent man I could not put my family through years of hell. I am a very ill man and depend on the sickness benifit I paid my contributions for, which incidently can be stopped without warning or reason by the department I would be exposing as criminal. Sorry if this message has no relevance to poor Mr rico sordas family being attacked but as many families know the jersey system does not work and is controlled by personal assassination of anyone who dares to expose the gutter rats. By this statement I do not mean to include the hard working majority or their families. I really want to expose myself but as social security have complete control of my life I can't. In fact I am still harassed to this very day by the S'S because of the lies on my records at S'S which incidently when I requested information was refused. This is the first time I have used this type of media and I expect the last as my wife would kill me if someone at S'S or housing puts 2 & 2 together.

Anonymous said...

I know this has little to do with Ricos horrendous battle with jersey's scum ruling hirachy but in the early 2000s I asked data protection to investigate housing and social security exchanging emails Which contained false personal details which resulted in my payments of sickness benifits being stopped without notice and housing breaking into my States flat to change the locks and eventually being forced into leaving my family in Jersey before I committed criminal acts which would have seen me in prison on a life sentence for multiple murders they had reduced me to a physical and mental reck. Data protection refused to investigate after enquiries at both departments in fact they barred me from their office and ignored me totally. I approached the police and was in plain English told to go away. If there was a true legal aid system I would have sued them all but again I was told they would not even consider my case. Jersey is a society run by little Hitlers. If my family lived elsewhere I would have gone to the papers in England and forced this group of rats to take me to court but as with any decent man I could not put my family through years of hell. I am a very ill man and depend on the sickness benifit I paid my contributions for, which incidently can be stopped without warning or reason by the department I would be exposing as criminal. Sorry if this message has no relevance to poor Mr rico sordas family being attacked but as many families know the jersey system does not work and is controlled by personal assassination of anyone who dares to expose the gutter rats. By this statement I do not mean to include the hard working majority or their families. I really want to expose myself but as social security have complete control of my life I can't. In fact I am still harassed to this very day by the S'S because of the lies on my records at S'S which incidently when I requested information was refused. This is the first time I have used this type of media and I expect the last as my wife would kill me if someone at S'S or housing puts 2 & 2 together.

Anonymous said...

Anon "August 8, 2014 at 6:01 PM"

The trial of the four was a sort of super injunction, so not mentioned in the mainstream media. Questions were asked afterwards about it in the States under "parliamentary priviledge". More info (a lot) will be found on Stuart Syvret's blog currently copied at

http://freespeechoffshore.nl/stuartsyvretblog/


Anonymous said...

https://www.facebook.com/groups/531920140253457/

Anyone having trouble accessing that link? Would like to, if only to keep an eye on the split personality loons. Now it could be that I'm currently faking my IP to be in India, or it could be that I'm using a pseudonym face book account (never a real one, come on!), OR it could be that they are blocking me in case I post comments that don't conform to their rabid, hate filled, alternative reality, tripe that they promote as the one real truth. I haven't posted anything there yet btw, but my gut feeling is they are paranoid and running scared.

JRCbean

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

"August 8, 2014 at 6:01 PM"

The trial of the four was a sort of super injunction, so not mentioned in the mainstream media. Questions were asked afterwards about it in the States under "parliamentary priviledge". More info (a lot) will be found on Stuart Syvret's blog currently copied at.

This is partly correct. Senator Router was asked by Ex Deputy Pitman, how mych the total cost of the trial to date had cost the taxpayer ? He made it clear this was all he was asking. Senator Router refused to answer adding " it was not a subject he could supply detail being a super injunction.

Would it not be interesting to view all the four witness statements.

You cannot. It's not for your eyes all being secret including, truth's, possible lies, exaggerations,

The Government you may not deserve but certainly have.

Anonymous said...

To the ANON COMMENT August 10, 2014 at 12:23 AM

Can you please leave an email so i can contact you , im very interested in your case

rico sorda said...

Part 3 will be up today.

rs

Suono Ladro said...

Your is merely a food who is drunk on the power of being able to annoy you. When he has nothing to hold up in order to hide how much he hates himself then he will be exposed.

Stay strong Rico.

rico sorda said...

You can email me at ricosorda@yahoo.co.uk.

You will be interested in my next posting which will be up tonight

rs

Anonymous said...

Just a thought, and no doubt greater minds than mine are already considering this, but wouldn't Jony Haworth be in a lot of trouble if his behaviour proven here contradicted the stuff he said in court documents against Syvret?

In fact, that could be a lot of trouble.

Anonymous said...

Interesting comment ~ 'Just a thought, and no doubt greater minds than mine are already considering this, but wouldn't Jony Haworth be in a lot of trouble if his behaviour proven here contradicted the stuff he said in court documents against Syvret?

In fact, that could be a lot of trouble.'

Yes and thinking about that isn't the real problem Haworth's caused here for the courts now? We've all seen how Jersey's judiciary is political and corrupt but not even they could carry on taking Haworth's side now? Actually you know thinking about this as I type it would be good if they did. Wouldn't that just be the final nail in their coffin if they did in the eys of outsiders?

Anonymous said...

Only got 1/10 of the way through the comments on http://freespeechoffshore.nl/stuartsyvretblog/jason-the-maverick/

Anonymous said… Wednesday, 20 May 2009 18:38:00 GMT+1

[Ref] JASON ROBERTS or JASON THE MAVERICK [JH/JSH]
Thank you Stuart ! I am one of those traumatised persons that has been severly threatened and I still have my evidence ! (as do the police) , I chanced them helping and they did.I had threats about my own job from him , as well as threats to my collegues and my own life.But he also claimed the government were helping him and would ruin my life forever.Thats why I went to the police !To those of you that think he is a normal guy , please think again.

I am too afraid to say who I am just incase “they” do come to get me.If I was a member of his family I would be ashamed to be related to him !